Publicité
Jack Bizlall s’oppose à la décision de la présidente de nommer Pravind Jugnauth PM
Par
Partager cet article
Jack Bizlall s’oppose à la décision de la présidente de nommer Pravind Jugnauth PM
La société civile fait entendre sa voix. Après des politiques, à l’instar de Navin Ramgoolam, Xavier-Luc Duval et Alan Ganoo samedi 21 janvier et de Paul Bérenger dimanche, c’est Jack Bizlall qui monte au créneau pour dénoncer la passation de pouvoir entre sir Anerood Jugnauth et son fils Pravind à la tête du gouvernement.
L’observateur politique a écrit une lettre ouverte à Ameenah Gurib-Fakim, la présidente de la République, dimanche 22 janvier. Il soutient qu’en nommant son fils Premier ministre, sir Anerood Jugnauth a «définitivement» agi contre non seulement la Constitution mais aussi la notion de République et la démocratie représentative.
De plus, Jack Bizlall avance que comme sir Anerood Jugnauth ait pu agir anticonstitutionnellement, Ameenah Gurib-Fakim peut elle-même être en train de faire de même considérant qu’elle accepte toutes ces actions.
De ce fait, le syndicaliste souligne qu’il se réserve le droit de contester la décision d’Ameenah Gurib-Fakim si elle nomme Pravind Jugnauth Premier ministre et sir Anerood ministre de n’importe quel gouvernement que Pravind Jugnauth puisse proposer à la présidente de la République.
A lire ci-dessous la lettre de Jack Bizlall.
Madam,
<p>In my letter of the 31st October 2016, I appealed for your intervention “in the following issues set hereunder which are of paramount importance for the population of Mauritius, in the light of Section 1 of the Constitution of Mauritius, which clearly states that Mauritius shall be a sovereign democratic State which shall be known as the Republic of Mauritius.</p>
<p>I added that “There is indeed no indication in our constitution that any family can rule over Mauritius as a Dynasty as the Jugnauth family is trying by all means to do” and that comment was followed by my implied appeal that you read and eventually act as provide in “Sections 28 (1); 31 (1), 58 (1), and specifically Section 64 (3) and Section 65 of the constitution.” That has NOT been done apparently and therefore any anti-constitutional act of the Jugnauth family is being done with YOUR assent. You have been warned to read and have legal opinion on the above named sections of the Constitution.</p>
<p>In that same letter I also humbly requested you “to advise the Prime Minister, Mr. A. Jugnauth, NOT to usurp your powers under Section 59 of the Constitution, by making statements that when he will resign from his office as Prime Minister, to allow his son P. Jugnauth to take over. Such act should be your prerogative in “your own deliberate judgment” and is NOT his”.</p>
<p>What do I see? A. Jugnauth PM appointing his son as PM. Actions to take place tomorrow, Monday the 23rd January 2017. By so doing A. Jugnauth has DEFINITELY acted against not only the Constitution of the Republic of Mauritius bUT surely against the notion of the Republic and representative democracy. This is NOT bearable.</p>
<p>A. Jugnauth has appointed himself, as Lee Kwan Yeu did, Senior Minister and eventually Minister Mentor. WHAT IS ALL THAT ?. Nous ne sommes pas dans le royaume d’Hastinapura de la dynastie des Kuru. Epargnez-nous d’une deuxième Mahabharata.</p>
<p>Being given that you are condoning all these actions, and considering that A. Jugnauth may have acted anti-constitutionally in the light of Section 1 of our constitution; and that you yourself may be acting unconstitutionally in the light of Sections Section 28 (1); 31 (1), 58 (1), and specifically Section 64 (3) and Section 65 of the constitution; I give you notice of my ever preserved right to contest your decision if you happen to appoint P. Jugnauth PM, and A. Jugnauth Minister of any government that may be proposed to you by P. Jugnauth.</p>
<p>Yours sincerely</p>
<p>Jack Bizlall</p>
Publicité
Publicité
Les plus récents
