Publicité
Natural & Unnatural Alliances
The mating season of politicians is approaching as we come closer to the next general elections. Courtship, seduction, coercion, divorce, and weddings or alliances are on the agenda. And then there are alliances that are natural or guided by the providence and unnatural or evil alliances. In a recent Sofres poll published in Business Magazine, a number of permutations were tested: alliance MMM-Ptr, MMM-MSM and Ptr-MSM.
Lots have been said concerning these permutations and more will be said until matters are fixed, and until they are unfixed again?. However, pictures say a lot more than words. Though we cannot have pictures of weddings that have not yet taken place, we can still use the results of the poll to see into the future how the different weddings would look like and whether they would result in bliss or doom. The graphics below show composite ("radar") graphs obtained by the different permutations. The graphics are almost self-explanatory except for some brief comments that the readers could extrapolate on their own.
-
Both the size and the shapes of the graphs are important. The bigger the size, the more popular is an alliance. The shapes indicate the beneficial effects or the hazards they pose to the nation. The rounder the shape, the better it is.
-
The graph of the alliance of Ptr-MSM is not balanced and resembles a boomerang (prophetic?) showing its communal bias, its gender bias and that it is most popular with the age group of 60 years. It has quite a hazardous shape, to say the least.
-
The graphs of the alliance of MMM-MSM and that of MMM alone (to a lesser extent) are more balanced. They show that MMM alone or its alliance with MSM interests the population uniformly, either men or women, in cities or villages and almost equally in all communities. MMM-MSM gives a big round shape.
<B>Manu ([email protected])</B>
Publicité
Publicité
Les plus récents
