Publicité

Think small

1 août 2005, 20:00

Par

Partager cet article

Facebook X WhatsApp

lexpress.mu | Toute l'actualité de l'île Maurice en temps réel.

Think small might be the title of the article, but it does not refer to the current spat between the president and the prime minister of the country. Nor does it refer to small-mindedness, which blossoms so fully in certain quarters of the population, that we might be led to believe that it is part of the national characteristic. But rather, it applies to this often neglected sector of the modern capitalist economy: small and medium enterprises (SMEs). They might not be seen throwing their weight around, like the large multinationals and they rarely occupy media space but they are the lynchpin of all modern and dynamic economies. In Mauritius, we have given too little attention to them, or rather their development has been somewhat erratic.

Ireland, hailed as the prime example of economic development to such an extent that American commentators urge the world to follow its lead, has benefited to no small extent from the contribution of small firms. In fact, SMEs contribute 60% of GDP and employs 51% of the country’s private sector workforce. The sector has been one of the driving factors behind economic growth in the country. The 190,000 small enterprises were mainly created during Ireland’s economic boom in the nineties. Before, the island had lived with high unemployment, emigration and economic stagnation. These depressing trends were reversed by the entrepreneurship of the nation and its highly educated workforce.

At the moment, Mauritius can be said to be suffering from similar symptoms as the Irish did before the Celtic Tiger phenomenon, though not to the same extent. Unemployment and emigration are at high levels, though nothing alarming yet, and the economy is not really flying. The last government’s quasi-Keynesian policies kept growth afloat, but realistically this cannot be sustained because of the size of the country and also because these gentlemen in the World Trade Centre (WTO) would get on our backs. Secondly, there has been a change in government, with a new finance minister, whose economic thinking would favour a relaxation of the tax regime. However, whatever outlook the next budget takes and despite the change of regime, there should be a real effort to boost the development capacity of SMEs.

Slow-down in creation</B>

A study, by Dr. S. Matadeen in 2004, revealed some interesting facts about small firms in Mauritius. Before 1984, creation of SMEs was very slow, with only 6% created then. By the late 80s and early 90s, this had accelerated, with 29% set up between 85 and 89, 23% in the next five years and 30% during the period 95 to 99. However, there was a slow down in the last five years with only 12% of SMEs created. Furthermore, the sector of operation throws some light of where our entrepreneurs see themselves. 26% invested in wood products and furniture while another 22% set up business in food, beverages and tobacco. 18% of them operated in the textile industry.

However, Matadeen’s study reveals a worrying aspect of our economy in the sense that there are virtually no IT companies. Since the country is bound to phase out the sugar industry, coupled with the textile industry’s inability to fight off Chinese competition, Information and Communications Technology (ICT) has come to represent the only viable future for the country. But our present lack of skilled labour to sustain increased activity on this front is worrying. The Indian economy’s continuous growth, and indeed Ireland’s success story are both centred on ICT. What they both had in common was a highly educated population waiting, ready to embrace the changes in technology. ICT also represents an area where investments can initially be at a low level. The example of Google, set up by two college students, but the now biggest media company in the world, should be an inspiration. While the search engine’s success cannot be replicated easily, and no one is expected to do so, there are plenty of avenues to be exploited in the sector.

<B>Future for Africa</B>

But back to SMEs and we can see their importance to Africa’s economy. They represent nearly 90% of private business on the continent, and contribute to roughly 50% of GDP and employment according to the African Development Bank. Many have developed from micro enterprises (with less than 5 workers, though a company with such a workforce would be classed SME in Europe) to SMEs. Without doubt, small firms are the future for Africa but they need to be supported. And the advantage inherent in promoting small firms is that they represent real indigenous investment and growth. While corporations are usually attracted to low corporate tax countries, their contribution to the economy is minimal, because of the phenomenon of capital flight, when profits are repatriated and not invested in the host country. With local firms driving the economy, profits are ploughed back into the country, raising the standard of living.

Our challenge in Mauritius, is how much the government of the day understands the importance of SMEs and gives them appropriate support. Heavy investment will be needed in education as well as in support mechanisms for small firms to prosper. We tend to think that large corporations are good, because logically a big company employs more people and generates more capital. But we are moving towards a world where everything is becoming specialised. Even multinationals are made of small units of production these days, each with their own budget and managerial teams. SMEs represent the future of the country.

At the moment, we are at the crossroads and we will need men and women of ideas and conviction to make sure we choose the right direction. Fewer populist decisions and more tough ones are needed if we are to succeed.

<B>Diren VALAYDEN</B> <I>Outlook Correspondent in Dublin</I>

Publicité