Publicité
Plumes engagées
When the law becomes a reason to keep fighting
Par
Partager cet article
Plumes engagées
When the law becomes a reason to keep fighting
Thanya Meghna Canoo.
À l’heure du tout à l’image et du buzz sans suite, «l’express» souhaite faire découvrir la plume de poètes, de chanteurs, d’écrivains et de tous ceux qui jettent leur âme sur le papier, et qui mettent en mots des réflexions profondes.
There is something deeply human
about the law.
At first, it may appear to be nothing
more than statutes, precedents, principles
and procedures. But beneath all of its
technical language lies something far
more profound: people. People who have
been wronged, people seeking protection,
people defending themselves, people
demanding accountability, and people
hoping that somewhere within the system,
justice will hear them.
Perhaps that is why the law carries such
emotional weight.
To fight for justice is not always to stand
on the side that is strongest. Sometimes,
it means standing beside the person who
has been left with nothing but their truth
and the courage to pursue it.
The law does not promise that the person
who is right will always win. It does not
promise that institutions will never fail,
that power will never be abused, or that
justice will always arrive when
it is needed most.
But it provides something incredibly
important:
the right to challenge.
The right to question an exercise
of power.
The right to demand accountability.
The right to be heard.
The right to defend oneself.
The right to seek a remedy when
something has gone wrong.
And sometimes, when everything feels
hopeless, that right becomes
a form of hope.
There is a particular loneliness in
fighting against something far greater
than yourself. When the opposing side
has greater influence, greater resources
or simply more people standing behind
them, it can become tempting to believe
that the outcome has already
been decided.
But the law teaches us that power alone
should never determine justice.
The principle of the rule of law rests upon
the idea that authority is not absolute.
No institution should be beyond scrutiny
merely because it possesses power.
No individual should be deprived
of their rights simply because their voice
is weaker.
That principle may sound abstract
in a textbook.
But in real life, it can mean everything
to someone who feels unheard.
Perhaps this is where law and emotion meet.
A legal dispute may be reduced to issues,
facts and authorities on paper, but behind
those words may be someone’s fear,
dignity, livelihood, reputation or future.
A judgment may contain carefully
reasoned paragraphs, but for the person
waiting for it, those paragraphs may
represent years of uncertainty.
A legal argument may be intellectually
fascinating to a student, but to the person
whose life depends upon its success, it
may represent something
much more personal:
Hope.
And yet, emotion cannot replace law.
Justice requires discipline.
It requires evidence when emotions
demand assumptions.
It requires due process when society
demands immediate punishment.
It requires impartiality when anger
demands revenge.
It requires reason even when the facts are
deeply painful.
Perhaps that is one of the most difficult
and beautiful things about law: it asks
us to remain human without allowing
emotion to destroy fairness.
The courage to fight, therefore, is not
simply the courage to speak loudly.
It is the courage to remain standing when
nobody seems to believe you.
It is the courage to continue researching
when the answer seems impossible.
It is the courage to challenge a decision
that appears untouchable.
It is the courage to defend a principle even
when doing so is unpopular.
And sometimes, it is the courage to accept
that justice may take time.
Not every battle ends in victory.
Some arguments fail.
Some appeals are dismissed.
Some injustices cannot be completely
undone.
But losing does not necessarily make
the pursuit meaningless.
Sometimes, a legal challenge changes
the conversation.
Sometimes, it exposes a weakness
in the system.
Sometimes, it creates a precedent
for those who come after.
And sometimes, simply refusing to
remain silent becomes the first step
towards change.
That is why I think the law is ultimately
about more than winning.
It is about standing.
Standing for rights.
Standing for principle.
Standing for fairness.
Standing for someone who may not have
the strength to stand alone.
And perhaps most importantly, standing
when standing is difficult.
Because there will always be moments
when the world seems to have chosen
a side before the argument has even
been heard.
There will always be people who tell you
that nothing can be changed.
There will always be circumstances
that make surrender seem easier.
But justice has never been built by people
who only fought when the outcome
was certain.
It has been shaped by those who were
willing to question, challenge and
persevere.
So perhaps the greatest lesson the law can
teach is not that justice will always prevail.
It is that justice remains worth pursuing
even when it is difficult to see.
And when the odds are against you, when
the room feels empty, when your voice
feels small, and when giving up feels
easier than continuing,
perhaps that is precisely when conviction
matters most.
Because sometimes, the law cannot
promise you victory.
But it can give you something else.
A voice.
A remedy.
A right to be heard.
And sometimes, that is enough to begin
a fight that may eventually change
everything.

Bio
Thanya Meghna Canoo
This 22-year-old Law student is an internationally recognized young author who has published her first book.
Publicité
Publicité
Les plus récents