Publicité
Kenya power struggle climaxes in charter vote
Par
Partager cet article
Kenya power struggle climaxes in charter vote
From misty highlands to steamy coast, Kenyans voted on Monday in a referendum on a new constitution amid fears violence could mar a vote seen as a dress rehearsal for the east African nation’s 2007 election. Queues formed before dawn as polling booths opened at 7 a.m. and some 50,000 security officers were on duty. Polls close at 5 p.m. Results are due overnight.
President Mwai Kibaki has staked his political prestige on the vote, which has turned into a power struggle with foes who say he has failed to end decades of graft and tribalism. The tussle between Kibaki’s “Yes” camp and his opponents’ “No” campaign has widened a cabinet split and deepened tribal tensions in the country of 32 million people, seen by Western allies as a lynchpin of stability in a turbulent region. The main controversy over the proposed new charter centres on the powers of the president, with critics saying it ignores the desire of most Kenyans to balance those powers with a strong prime minister’s post and other checks.
The existing constitution was drawn up on the eve of independence from Britain in 1963. “We need to change this old colonial constitution which has been used to oppress us. This is my patriotic duty,” engineer and early “Yes” voter Peter Mathenge, 32, said as mist swirled round Kibaki’s highland hometown of Othaya. At opposition leader Uhuru Kenyatta’s hometown of Gatundu, also in highlands north of Nairobi, most were voting “No” in line with him. “Uhuru has told us to vote ‘No’. We will follow him even if he tells us to go to the wilderness,” said Sam Kungu, a jobless 32-year-old.
Paramilitaries deployed</B>
Paramilitary and regular police units deployed overnight at perceived potential flashpoints after a turbulent campaign in which violence killed nine people and wounded dozens. Witnesses reported scores of paramilitary officers armed with assault rifles on the edge of Nairobi’s volatile Kibera slum, an opposition stronghold, from Sunday evening. “This is normal practice in areas where there may be tension, but no one should feel intimidated to vote,” said Mani Lemayian, a spokesman for the electoral commission. Some said the arrival of the feared paramilitary General Service Unit in Kibera might stoke tensions there, noting there was no such deployment during peaceful elections in 2002.
“That is clearly intimidation,” said Koki Muli, a poll expert organising a 19,000-strong force of Kenyan observers during the referendum. «It just does not help. Everyone is on edge, scared and nervous as it is,» she told Reuters. Riots convulsed Nairobi for three days in July when the constitution was published. At least one person was killed. A further eight have been killed in riots around campaign rallies. Kibaki, 74, says the new charter will improve governance in a country ruined by decades of “Big Man” rule and theft of state funds under his strongman predecessor Daniel arap Moi.
In reality, critics argue, Kibaki is staging the vote to try to quash cabinet dissidents who accuse him of concentrating power around his Kikuyu tribe and permitting a group of business cronies to loot state coffers, a charge he denies. Although there were only several small opinion polls in the run-up to Monday’s vote, they showed the “No” camp ahead. Voters in Western Kenya, heartland of the Luo tribe whose leaders are backing the “No” vote, were in a confident mood. “We expect a big victory for the Orange,” said Kisumu town legislator Ken Nyagudi, referring to the “No” campaign’s fruit symbol. As he cast his vote, Nyagudi added, however, that the opposition feared “foul play” to rob the “No” camp of victory.
<B>William MACLEAN</B>
Publicité
Publicité
Les plus récents