Publicité

Teachers urged to do research in curriculum development

7 mai 2007, 20:00

Par

Partager cet article

Facebook X WhatsApp

lexpress.mu | Toute l'actualité de l'île Maurice en temps réel.

“Research is an integral part of the teacher’s job.” And yet, the feeling is that there is not much research done in the field of education. This is why the Mauritius Institute of Education (MIE) holds an annual conference every year to try and encourage students to start research. This year, the theme chosen was very topical, as the conference focused on curriculum reform and teacher development.

The conference, which took place on 20th of April, was held in the context of one of the modules of the MA Education Programme called Research Methodology. Not only did this conference aim at teaching students what research is but it also allowed them to talk to experienced teachers who have been involved in such research.

Ex-students or those who are finishing their research at the end of the month engaged in roundtable discussions with the new ones to discuss their difficulties and problems and explain how they manage to overcome them. “Students are then able to gain from the first hand experience of their colleagues and are able to ask them questions about methodology, content or process of research,” states Anita Curpen from the MIE, who organised the conference.

For the MIE, this conference was the occasion to develop research. “Teaching is not simply reproducing a certain number of practices including the best practices in different country contexts as well as those already in force in Mauritius. It should be an ongoing research process,” comments Anita Curpen.

“The most important is reflection. We can’t afford to do our jobs like civil servants of the training sector without asking ourselves questions about what we’re doing. We should also look at how relevant training is compared to the realities faced by teachers in schools. And if the ministry starts a reform project, the MIE should see how to establish coherence between training and the new programme,” said Rada Tirvassen, senior lecturer at the MIE, on the occasion of Teachers’ Day a few months back.

“So, this conference appears even more relevant in a context where the sector is undergoing curriculum reform. This reform should not be imposed on teachers; teachers should own their reform”</I>

So, this conference appears even more relevant in a context where the sector is undergoing curriculum reform. “The aim of the conference was not to discuss conclusions of the reform but to start a debate around the reform with special emphasis on the role of teachers. This reform should not be something that is imposed on teachers; teachers should own their reform,” she further explains.

In fact, as the director of curriculum of the ministry of Education, Santosh Kumar Mahadeo, stated in his keynote address at the beginning of the conference, “Curriculum development is a job that requires people and resources. It requires a skilled team of educators spending many thousands of hours writing, thinking, working in classrooms, and listening to teachers and students”. He goes even further when he adds, “Curriculum is primarily a tool for teacher development. The teacher must truly be in partnership with the curriculum rather than simply using it as a guide for sequencing student work”.

Teachers are indeed expected to play a major role in the reform. They are those who will make the curriculum operational. “As professionals they are the lynchpins between government policy, effective learning and pupil achievement,” Anita Curpen adds. In order to better respond to the children’s needs, teachers will of course need to know their subject, the new curricula and the pupils’ potential and needs. These are the first steps towards efficient teaching.

But they should also be able to interpret the syllabus, and even more importantly, develop imaginative and innovatory pedagogical skills to cater for all pupils. Therefore, research appears as a must. There is no possibility of being innovative and creative without teachers asking themselves a certain number of questions. “Professionalism is evidenced where teachers commit to personal learning in pedagogy, to continuing professional development including drawing on research in education theory, policy and practice in their discipline,” says Anita Curpen. “Teacher decision-making is key and the curriculum must be designed with this assumption in mind. The teacher’s role is to connect the particulars of the classroom and students to the investigations presented by the curriculum,” comments the director of curriculum.

If teachers rest on their laurels, satisfied with what they learnt at the beginning of their career, they will not be able to bring innovative knowledge and methodologies to their pupils. “We can’t consider that there is one recipe that is able to develop all the knowledge and know-how necessary for a whole career. For instance, most teachers who come to the MIE will do their job for at least 30 years. How can we train for the next thirty years if we don’t even know how society will develop? We have to consider the first major training like a stage in a continuing process,” says Rada Tirvassen.

The organiser of the conference however makes it clear that the research is not of the purely academic variety. It has to be practitioners’ research so that it can be effective for the whole community of teachers in relation to the way they carry out their job on a daily basis. Teacher development appears crucial to guarantee the success of the curriculum reform. “New times need new teaching strategies,” sums up Santosh Kumar Mahadeo.

Publicité